Safety and Health Reporter
Brien Roche Law > Blog > Nursing Home Abuse > Nursing Home Warning Signs

Nursing Home Warning Signs

Fairfax Injury Lawyer Brien Roche Addresses Nursing Home Warning Signs

Brien Roche

If you are a loved one of a person in a nursing home, you should be on the lookout for certain nursing home abuse warning signs:

  • Bed sores also called pressure sores
  • Poor hygiene
  • Bruises
  • Unexplained falls
  • Inadequate staffing
  • Dehydration
  • Medication errors

To prove nursing home negligence it is necessary to establish that the care that has been provided to the resident is substandard and that substandard care resulted in injury to the resident.
Nursing homes and long term care facilities need to be held accountable for harm that they cause. If you think you or a loved one has a basis for such a claim, contact us.

Researching Nursing Home Warning Signs

If you think you have a basis for a claim against a nursing home or a long term care facility, you may want to search Medicare’s site dealing with nursing home care. This site provides information about all facilities that are Medicare or Medicaid certified.

Any facility which accepts Medicaid funds must also abide by the pertinent regulations establishing standards for care in these facilities. Many of these regulations are put out by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) and are administered through the states.

Medicaid-certified facilities are evaluated every year and are required to meet federal and state certification, licensing and performance standards. Medicare’s Nursing Home Compare program provides information about nursing homes as to ownership, whether they are for profit and other valuable information.

Nursing Home Standards

The so-called watermelon book (a reference to its color) is formally known as the Long Term Care Survey and is published by the American Health Care Association. It contains the federal regulations from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that guide nursing home staff. The comprehensive regulations contained within this book are also referred to as F-tags. They are published also in the Federal Register. These F-tags set forth basic standards as to nursing home care. They are critical in terms of evaluating cases from a litigation point of view.

In terms of litigating nursing home cases, it is important to take the deposition of the nursing home’s medical director whose responsibility is set forth in F-tag 501. The medical director of the nursing home is probably going to be your best witness in terms of confirming that the F-tags indeed establish the standard of care for nursing homes. These regulations can be found at 42 C.F.R. §483.

Issues In Nursing Home Litigation

In the course of nursing home litigation a number of different issues can arise. Many nursing home cases involve pressure sores or bed sores. A typical defense asserted by the nursing home is that these bed sores are in fact terminal ulcers that are unavoidable. Under F-tag 314 you have a strong argument to make that a bed sore cannot be characterized as unavoidable unless all appropriate efforts have been made to prevent it and to heal it.

Another frequent issue in nursing home cases is general staffing. The fewer the number of staff people that are on duty at any given time the greater the profit for the nursing home. The staffing to patient ratio needs to be closely looked at.

In addition, within many nursing home contracts there are mandatory arbitration clauses. These deprive the patient of the right to a jury trial. It is important to look at the contract and if in fact there is a mandatory arbitration clause it needs to be evaluated as to whether or not it is enforceable.

The nursing home industry is very sophisticated. What many nursing home corporations do is to establish an intricate network wherein the nursing home operation is conducted by one legal entity, the building and grounds are owned by another legal entity and the staff may even be provided by yet a third legal entity. That creates a difficult network of corporations that potentially may need to be pierced if there is inadequate insurance coverage. Some factors to consider in determining who really controls the nursing home are:

  • It may be necessary to take the depositions of employees from the bottom up to find out who is really in control.
  • Request the pay stubs of all empl0yees you depose.
  • Show the policy and procedure manual to all employees you depose to get them to confirm who prepared this manual and that the manual governs their behavior.
  • Ask all employees if they are on a bonus system and if so how the bonus is determined and who pays it.
  • Get the email address of all the employees you depose as this may show who is in charge

The key to winning a nursing home case is to focus on the nursing home not on the patient:

  • Show the number of statutory violations committed.
  • Show the number of instances where the internal rules and admissions contract of the nursing home were violated.
  • Show the understaffing by obtaining employee lists, employee files, census and acuity records and that the nursing home was putting profits before patient care.
  • Show the pay level of the nursing home staff and how it compares with the local fast food restaurants.
  • Obtain incident and accident reports involving the patient pursuant to 42 CFR483.10(b)(2).
  • Show the jury they are empowered to make the defendant take responsibility for its conduct.
  • Show the jury what the nursing home has taken from the patient and that the patient is entitled to be paid for the loss.

Nursing Home Records

Nursing home records are of course critical in any nursing home case. In most nursing home cases the most important expert to be retained is a nurse with experience in long-term care.  The nurse is of course going to want all of the records and those records should probably be organized in logical fashion consistent with the following:

  1. Hospital records showing the hospitalization that preceded the nursing home stay.
  2. Admission evaluations which are required under federal regulations and should set forth a comprehensive plan of care developed within fourteen (14) days of admission.  Within these evaluations there may be determinations as to risk of fall, nutritional compromise, problems with ulcers.
  3. Plans of care set forth the particular care a facility is to provide based on the problems identified.
  4. Interdisciplinary and nursing notes reflect how the care may have changed and any harm to the resident.
  5. Physician entries are required by federal regulation.  The physician has to supervise the medical care.  There must be an admitting physician examination, admitting orders and ongoing updated doctor’s orders during regularly scheduled examinations required every 30 days for the first 90 days of admission.
  6. Records of therapy.
  7. Medication and treatment administration records.
  8. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Flow Sheets.
  9. Minimum data sets containing medical condition, functional capacity, care needs and many other factors.
  10. Investigation reports.
  11. Laboratory and imaging studies.
  12. Photographs may be contained in the file as evidence of the resident’s condition at different points in time.

Nursing Home Records Must Be Provided

All nursing homes are required under federal regulation to provide requested copies of records to the resident or family within 24 hours.

Nursing Home Arbitration Requirement

Nursing home arbitration requirements have been the subject of some litigation over the last many years.  Many nursing home contracts contain a mandatory nursing home arbitration clause requiring that any disputes between the patient and the nursing home,whether it be one of nursing home abuse or otherwise, be submitted to either a single arbitrator or a board of arbitrators for resolution.  That deprives the patient of their right to a jury trial.

It is well established that any intelligent adult can voluntarily waive their right to a jury trial.  The waiver however that exists in nursing home arbitration contracts may, in some instances, be unconscionable because the patient frequently is not the one who is making the decision about admission and the circumstances of admission are normally such that the family and/or decision maker is under the gun to make a prompt decision because the person has to be placed in some facility.

The down side of arbitration of claims against a nursing home is the lack of the right to a jury trial, the increased cost of having to pay one or more arbitrators to decide the case in addition to having to pay your own attorney and the fact that arbitration awards that are decided by arbitrators tend to be smaller awards than cases that are submitted to a Judge or jury for a decision.  In addition, arbitration awards are typically confidential and therefore there is no public record as to what has gone wrong at this nursing home.  A Court decision typically is not going to be governed by any such confidentiality unless there is a settlement that is reached that provides for such.

The one advantage to arbitration as opposed to litigating a nursing home case in Civil Court is that arbitration can be more expeditious, i.e. you get a quicker decision.

On September 28, 2016 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule prohibiting nursing homes from using pre-dispute forced arbitration agreements in admission contracts that were dated after November 28, 2016. This rule applies to all skilled nursing facilities that receive money from Medicare and Medicaid which includes the vast majority of facilities in the United States.

In those instances where you or someone on your behalf has signed a nursing home arbitration contract that contains an arbitration clause and you later on want to disown it you need to look at whether or not there is an opt-out provision within the nursing home agreement.  That is, many nursing home agreements have a right to opt-out of the nursing home arbitration agreement within 30 days after you have signed it.  That opt-out provision is intended to give you a chance to “cool off” and to more intelligently review the contract that has been entered into.  In addition, it is possible to claim that the arbitration requirement is simply unconscionable, i.e. that it simply was too much to expect that a person making a decision about nursing home care could intelligently review and evaluate multiple pages of a nursing home contract that contains an arbitration clause probably hidden in the small print.  That argument in Virginia is probably a tough argument to make but it certainly is available.

Enforceability of Arbitration Requirements In Nursing Home Contract

There are a number of factors to be considered in determining whether or not an arbitration agreement within a nursing home contract is enforceable:

  • Although the U. S. Supreme Court in the case of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown indicated that a categorical rejection of arbitration clauses violates the Federal Arbitration Act, there still are instances where these agreements may be held unenforceable.
  • Many nursing home contracts call for arbitration to be conducted by the National Arbitration Forum.  It so happens that entity has refused to partake in such arbitrations over the last many years.  To the extent that the contract language indicates that the National Arbitration Forum was truly intended by both parties to be the arbitrator that may be a basis for voiding the contract.
  • Likewise, some contracts call for the American Health Lawyers Association to be the arbitrator.  This group has a particular pro-defense bias and that may well be a basis for excluding them as the arbitrator and/or voiding the contract.
  • To the extent that power of attorneys have been used to sign such contracts on behalf of the patient, the power of attorney itself may be defective because many power of attorneys do not take effect until disability is determined and further to the extent that they are medical power of attorneys it may be that the decision to enter a nursing home is not a medical decision.
  • Unconscionability of the agreement itself, of course, needs to be looked at closely in that these agreements may be unreasonable in that they favor one party over the other and clearly prevent one party from exercising certain rights.  Vast disparity between the parties may be a basis for voiding the contract.
  • Arbitration clauses that are one sided in allowing the nursing home to litigate but barring the patient from litigating may be defective.
  • Arbitration agreements that shorten limitation periods or require patients to travel significant distances to arbitrate may likewise be deemed to be unconscionable.
  • Arbitration clauses that put enhanced burdens on the plaintiff to prove his or her case likewise may be unconscionable.

Pressure Sores May Be A Form Of Nursing Home Abuse

Pressure sores preventable:  They are a bugaboo for any nursing home and can be deadly for the patient.They are sometimes called pressure sores or pressure ulcers or just bed sores and many people see them as a form of nursing home abuse.

Typically, pressure sores arise in tissue that is in proximity to some bony structure, i.e. the spine, the hip or the knee.  It is at these points that pressure is applied to the nearby tissue.  Most of these pressure sores occur in the lower part of the body, in particular the lower back and the hips.

Pressure sores can be staged into four different categories.  Stage I simply involves a red mark which usually can be healed fairly quickly.  Stage II involves blistering resembling a rash.  Stage III means that the wound has gone deeper and has begun to actually destroy tissue below the first level of the skin.  Stage IV involves a wound that typically goes all the way down to the bone.

There are federal regulations that have been put out as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 that set forth some arguable standards in regards to pressure sores.  The regulations actually state that they are only for licensing and rate reimbursement purposes and are not to be the basis for a lawsuit.  Under Virginia law, however, these regulations probably could be utilized as a basis for establishing a standard of care.  The question to be posed to any nursing home official is whether or not good nursing home practice would involve compliance with these regulations.  Of course the answer is yes.

What these federal regulations say in essence is that a resident who enters a nursing home without pressure sores should not be allowed to develop pressure sores unless the individual’s clinical condition demonstrates that they are unavoidable and further a resident having pressure sores must receive necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of the sores and prevention of new sores.  Some basic preventive measures are the use of special mattresses, maintaining strict turning and repositioning schedules of at least every two hours and use of medications when necessary.  If there is evidence of the care plan being deficient, then that would lead to the conclusion that the sores are not unavoidable.

The staff at a nursing home is required to complete and file what is called a minimum data set (MDS) and to file this computer generated item with Medicare and Medicaid for payment.  This document sets forth the various assessments and observations dealing with the patient.

Other documents of interest in any nursing home case are the 24-hour report, which is the report that involves the turnover of a patient from one shift to another.  Many nursing homes maintain that this information does not have to be maintained for long term and therefore it is discarded.  Also, the activities of daily living (ADL) flow sheet may contain a wealth of information.  Again, some nursing homes may maintain that this information does not have to be retained.

The bottom line is that pressure sores are highly preventable and with proper care can indeed be prevented.

State Run Nursing Homes

Nursing home abuse in state-run nursing homes in New York State was the subject of a recent expose in New York Times article published on March 12, 2011.  The investigation took place over a year and found significant problems in more than 2,000 state-run homes that house disabled people.

New York State law requires that incidents that involve criminal behavior are to be reported to law enforcement authorities.  The investigation, however, disclosed that very few of these purported criminal incidents were in fact reported.

Indeed, it was the practice of the state agency to handle most of these abuse allegations internally even though the agency lacked the apparent capacity to properly investigate these matter due to the lack of trained investigators.  In many instances the supervisors of the accused employees were the primary investigators.

The article reports that in 25% of the cases involving abuse the state employees were simply transferred to other homes.   State employees are protected by a worker’s union which aggressively defended the employees in all instances.

Many of these homes are in financially depressed areas and pay salaries that are generous by local standards.  The state has no educational requirements for employment within these homes and frequently the employees are performing sophisticated tasks such as administering drugs with little or no training or experience.

In one instance a state employee at a group home in Upstate New York was convicted of beating a 99 year old man.  He pled guilty to the misdemeanor and was barred from participating in federally financed health care programs but in spite of that he kept his state job working with disabled persons.

Consult a Nursing Home Injury Attorney

If you have a question about a nursing home case, contact us and see the pages on Wikipedia.

Comments are closed.

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Nursing Home Warning Signs

Fairfax Injury Lawyer Brien Roche Addresses Nursing Home Warning Signs

Brien Roche

If you are a loved one of a person in a nursing home, you should be on the lookout for certain nursing home abuse warning signs:

  • Bed sores also called pressure sores
  • Poor hygiene
  • Bruises
  • Unexplained falls
  • Inadequate staffing
  • Dehydration
  • Medication errors

To prove nursing home negligence it is necessary to establish that the care that has been provided to the resident is substandard and that substandard care resulted in injury to the resident.
Nursing homes and long term care facilities need to be held accountable for harm that they cause. If you think you or a loved one has a basis for such a claim, contact us.

Researching Nursing Home Warning Signs

If you think you have a basis for a claim against a nursing home or a long term care facility, you may want to search Medicare’s site dealing with nursing home care. This site provides information about all facilities that are Medicare or Medicaid certified.

Any facility which accepts Medicaid funds must also abide by the pertinent regulations establishing standards for care in these facilities. Many of these regulations are put out by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) and are administered through the states.

Medicaid-certified facilities are evaluated every year and are required to meet federal and state certification, licensing and performance standards. Medicare’s Nursing Home Compare program provides information about nursing homes as to ownership, whether they are for profit and other valuable information.

Nursing Home Standards

The so-called watermelon book (a reference to its color) is formally known as the Long Term Care Survey and is published by the American Health Care Association. It contains the federal regulations from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that guide nursing home staff. The comprehensive regulations contained within this book are also referred to as F-tags. They are published also in the Federal Register. These F-tags set forth basic standards as to nursing home care. They are critical in terms of evaluating cases from a litigation point of view.

In terms of litigating nursing home cases, it is important to take the deposition of the nursing home’s medical director whose responsibility is set forth in F-tag 501. The medical director of the nursing home is probably going to be your best witness in terms of confirming that the F-tags indeed establish the standard of care for nursing homes. These regulations can be found at 42 C.F.R. §483.

Issues In Nursing Home Litigation

In the course of nursing home litigation a number of different issues can arise. Many nursing home cases involve pressure sores or bed sores. A typical defense asserted by the nursing home is that these bed sores are in fact terminal ulcers that are unavoidable. Under F-tag 314 you have a strong argument to make that a bed sore cannot be characterized as unavoidable unless all appropriate efforts have been made to prevent it and to heal it.

Another frequent issue in nursing home cases is general staffing. The fewer the number of staff people that are on duty at any given time the greater the profit for the nursing home. The staffing to patient ratio needs to be closely looked at.

In addition, within many nursing home contracts there are mandatory arbitration clauses. These deprive the patient of the right to a jury trial. It is important to look at the contract and if in fact there is a mandatory arbitration clause it needs to be evaluated as to whether or not it is enforceable.

The nursing home industry is very sophisticated. What many nursing home corporations do is to establish an intricate network wherein the nursing home operation is conducted by one legal entity, the building and grounds are owned by another legal entity and the staff may even be provided by yet a third legal entity. That creates a difficult network of corporations that potentially may need to be pierced if there is inadequate insurance coverage. Some factors to consider in determining who really controls the nursing home are:

  • It may be necessary to take the depositions of employees from the bottom up to find out who is really in control.
  • Request the pay stubs of all empl0yees you depose.
  • Show the policy and procedure manual to all employees you depose to get them to confirm who prepared this manual and that the manual governs their behavior.
  • Ask all employees if they are on a bonus system and if so how the bonus is determined and who pays it.
  • Get the email address of all the employees you depose as this may show who is in charge

The key to winning a nursing home case is to focus on the nursing home not on the patient:

  • Show the number of statutory violations committed.
  • Show the number of instances where the internal rules and admissions contract of the nursing home were violated.
  • Show the understaffing by obtaining employee lists, employee files, census and acuity records and that the nursing home was putting profits before patient care.
  • Show the pay level of the nursing home staff and how it compares with the local fast food restaurants.
  • Obtain incident and accident reports involving the patient pursuant to 42 CFR483.10(b)(2).
  • Show the jury they are empowered to make the defendant take responsibility for its conduct.
  • Show the jury what the nursing home has taken from the patient and that the patient is entitled to be paid for the loss.

Nursing Home Records

Nursing home records are of course critical in any nursing home case. In most nursing home cases the most important expert to be retained is a nurse with experience in long-term care.  The nurse is of course going to want all of the records and those records should probably be organized in logical fashion consistent with the following:

  1. Hospital records showing the hospitalization that preceded the nursing home stay.
  2. Admission evaluations which are required under federal regulations and should set forth a comprehensive plan of care developed within fourteen (14) days of admission.  Within these evaluations there may be determinations as to risk of fall, nutritional compromise, problems with ulcers.
  3. Plans of care set forth the particular care a facility is to provide based on the problems identified.
  4. Interdisciplinary and nursing notes reflect how the care may have changed and any harm to the resident.
  5. Physician entries are required by federal regulation.  The physician has to supervise the medical care.  There must be an admitting physician examination, admitting orders and ongoing updated doctor’s orders during regularly scheduled examinations required every 30 days for the first 90 days of admission.
  6. Records of therapy.
  7. Medication and treatment administration records.
  8. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Flow Sheets.
  9. Minimum data sets containing medical condition, functional capacity, care needs and many other factors.
  10. Investigation reports.
  11. Laboratory and imaging studies.
  12. Photographs may be contained in the file as evidence of the resident’s condition at different points in time.

Nursing Home Records Must Be Provided

All nursing homes are required under federal regulation to provide requested copies of records to the resident or family within 24 hours.

Nursing Home Arbitration Requirement

Nursing home arbitration requirements have been the subject of some litigation over the last many years.  Many nursing home contracts contain a mandatory nursing home arbitration clause requiring that any disputes between the patient and the nursing home,whether it be one of nursing home abuse or otherwise, be submitted to either a single arbitrator or a board of arbitrators for resolution.  That deprives the patient of their right to a jury trial.

It is well established that any intelligent adult can voluntarily waive their right to a jury trial.  The waiver however that exists in nursing home arbitration contracts may, in some instances, be unconscionable because the patient frequently is not the one who is making the decision about admission and the circumstances of admission are normally such that the family and/or decision maker is under the gun to make a prompt decision because the person has to be placed in some facility.

The down side of arbitration of claims against a nursing home is the lack of the right to a jury trial, the increased cost of having to pay one or more arbitrators to decide the case in addition to having to pay your own attorney and the fact that arbitration awards that are decided by arbitrators tend to be smaller awards than cases that are submitted to a Judge or jury for a decision.  In addition, arbitration awards are typically confidential and therefore there is no public record as to what has gone wrong at this nursing home.  A Court decision typically is not going to be governed by any such confidentiality unless there is a settlement that is reached that provides for such.

The one advantage to arbitration as opposed to litigating a nursing home case in Civil Court is that arbitration can be more expeditious, i.e. you get a quicker decision.

On September 28, 2016 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule prohibiting nursing homes from using pre-dispute forced arbitration agreements in admission contracts that were dated after November 28, 2016. This rule applies to all skilled nursing facilities that receive money from Medicare and Medicaid which includes the vast majority of facilities in the United States.

In those instances where you or someone on your behalf has signed a nursing home arbitration contract that contains an arbitration clause and you later on want to disown it you need to look at whether or not there is an opt-out provision within the nursing home agreement.  That is, many nursing home agreements have a right to opt-out of the nursing home arbitration agreement within 30 days after you have signed it.  That opt-out provision is intended to give you a chance to “cool off” and to more intelligently review the contract that has been entered into.  In addition, it is possible to claim that the arbitration requirement is simply unconscionable, i.e. that it simply was too much to expect that a person making a decision about nursing home care could intelligently review and evaluate multiple pages of a nursing home contract that contains an arbitration clause probably hidden in the small print.  That argument in Virginia is probably a tough argument to make but it certainly is available.

Enforceability of Arbitration Requirements In Nursing Home Contract

There are a number of factors to be considered in determining whether or not an arbitration agreement within a nursing home contract is enforceable:

  • Although the U. S. Supreme Court in the case of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown indicated that a categorical rejection of arbitration clauses violates the Federal Arbitration Act, there still are instances where these agreements may be held unenforceable.
  • Many nursing home contracts call for arbitration to be conducted by the National Arbitration Forum.  It so happens that entity has refused to partake in such arbitrations over the last many years.  To the extent that the contract language indicates that the National Arbitration Forum was truly intended by both parties to be the arbitrator that may be a basis for voiding the contract.
  • Likewise, some contracts call for the American Health Lawyers Association to be the arbitrator.  This group has a particular pro-defense bias and that may well be a basis for excluding them as the arbitrator and/or voiding the contract.
  • To the extent that power of attorneys have been used to sign such contracts on behalf of the patient, the power of attorney itself may be defective because many power of attorneys do not take effect until disability is determined and further to the extent that they are medical power of attorneys it may be that the decision to enter a nursing home is not a medical decision.
  • Unconscionability of the agreement itself, of course, needs to be looked at closely in that these agreements may be unreasonable in that they favor one party over the other and clearly prevent one party from exercising certain rights.  Vast disparity between the parties may be a basis for voiding the contract.
  • Arbitration clauses that are one sided in allowing the nursing home to litigate but barring the patient from litigating may be defective.
  • Arbitration agreements that shorten limitation periods or require patients to travel significant distances to arbitrate may likewise be deemed to be unconscionable.
  • Arbitration clauses that put enhanced burdens on the plaintiff to prove his or her case likewise may be unconscionable.

Pressure Sores May Be A Form Of Nursing Home Abuse

Pressure sores preventable:  They are a bugaboo for any nursing home and can be deadly for the patient.They are sometimes called pressure sores or pressure ulcers or just bed sores and many people see them as a form of nursing home abuse.

Typically, pressure sores arise in tissue that is in proximity to some bony structure, i.e. the spine, the hip or the knee.  It is at these points that pressure is applied to the nearby tissue.  Most of these pressure sores occur in the lower part of the body, in particular the lower back and the hips.

Pressure sores can be staged into four different categories.  Stage I simply involves a red mark which usually can be healed fairly quickly.  Stage II involves blistering resembling a rash.  Stage III means that the wound has gone deeper and has begun to actually destroy tissue below the first level of the skin.  Stage IV involves a wound that typically goes all the way down to the bone.

There are federal regulations that have been put out as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 that set forth some arguable standards in regards to pressure sores.  The regulations actually state that they are only for licensing and rate reimbursement purposes and are not to be the basis for a lawsuit.  Under Virginia law, however, these regulations probably could be utilized as a basis for establishing a standard of care.  The question to be posed to any nursing home official is whether or not good nursing home practice would involve compliance with these regulations.  Of course the answer is yes.

What these federal regulations say in essence is that a resident who enters a nursing home without pressure sores should not be allowed to develop pressure sores unless the individual’s clinical condition demonstrates that they are unavoidable and further a resident having pressure sores must receive necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of the sores and prevention of new sores.  Some basic preventive measures are the use of special mattresses, maintaining strict turning and repositioning schedules of at least every two hours and use of medications when necessary.  If there is evidence of the care plan being deficient, then that would lead to the conclusion that the sores are not unavoidable.

The staff at a nursing home is required to complete and file what is called a minimum data set (MDS) and to file this computer generated item with Medicare and Medicaid for payment.  This document sets forth the various assessments and observations dealing with the patient.

Other documents of interest in any nursing home case are the 24-hour report, which is the report that involves the turnover of a patient from one shift to another.  Many nursing homes maintain that this information does not have to be maintained for long term and therefore it is discarded.  Also, the activities of daily living (ADL) flow sheet may contain a wealth of information.  Again, some nursing homes may maintain that this information does not have to be retained.

The bottom line is that pressure sores are highly preventable and with proper care can indeed be prevented.

State Run Nursing Homes

Nursing home abuse in state-run nursing homes in New York State was the subject of a recent expose in New York Times article published on March 12, 2011.  The investigation took place over a year and found significant problems in more than 2,000 state-run homes that house disabled people.

New York State law requires that incidents that involve criminal behavior are to be reported to law enforcement authorities.  The investigation, however, disclosed that very few of these purported criminal incidents were in fact reported.

Indeed, it was the practice of the state agency to handle most of these abuse allegations internally even though the agency lacked the apparent capacity to properly investigate these matter due to the lack of trained investigators.  In many instances the supervisors of the accused employees were the primary investigators.

The article reports that in 25% of the cases involving abuse the state employees were simply transferred to other homes.   State employees are protected by a worker’s union which aggressively defended the employees in all instances.

Many of these homes are in financially depressed areas and pay salaries that are generous by local standards.  The state has no educational requirements for employment within these homes and frequently the employees are performing sophisticated tasks such as administering drugs with little or no training or experience.

In one instance a state employee at a group home in Upstate New York was convicted of beating a 99 year old man.  He pled guilty to the misdemeanor and was barred from participating in federally financed health care programs but in spite of that he kept his state job working with disabled persons.

Consult a Nursing Home Injury Attorney

If you have a question about a nursing home case, contact us and see the pages on Wikipedia.

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Contact Us For A Free Consultation