Truck Accident Lawyer

Fairfax Injury Lawyer Brien Roche Addresses Truck Accident Cases

Brien Roche

Brien Roche is an experienced truck accident lawyer serving all of Northern Virginia, including Fairfax, McLean, Vienna, Burke, Annandale, Falls Church, Reston, Centreville, Manassas, Alexandria, Herndon, Arlington, and Loudoun County. If you have been involved in a truck accident contact us for a free consultation about your claim.

Truck accident litigation is hard fought and complex. Our roadways are loaded with large trucks which are typically called 18-wheelers. These 18-wheelers or tractor-trailers are mammoth vehicles that occupy their entire lane. Typically, they are driven by experienced drivers, but sometimes these drivers make mistakes.
Tractor trailer crashes account for approximately 500,000 vehicles accidents in the United States each year.  Drivers of these large trucks are ten times more likely to be the cause of a car crash than any other factor.  Those other potential factors may be such things as weather, road conditions or vehicle performance according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.

These massive vehicles can weigh up to 40 times more than your typical car.  When these trucks are fully loaded with approximately 80,000 pounds and traveling at 60 miles per hour they can demolish anything in their path.

Factors To Consider In Truck Accident Cases

  • Driver fatigue.
  • Shifting or falling cargo.
  • Faulty inspection and/or improper maintenance.
  • Drunk driving.

Investigating The Truck Accident

In investigating these types of cases some helpful hints are the following:

  • Go online to which is a website maintained by the federal government which provides helpful information.
  • Obtain copies of all of the policies of insurance that apply to the tractor, to the trailer, to the trucking company, to their independent contractors and to the shipper.
  • Establish that the trucking company is in fact a motor carrier and that it engages in interstate commerce.
  • Familiarize yourself with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations and also the International Fuel Tax Agreement.  The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations require that a driver record duty status for a 24 hour period.  Comparing these types of logs with fuel receipts, bills of lading, delivery manifest, GPS tracking information and accounting records may tell you precisely where the driver was at any point in time and for how many hours the driver had been on the road.  Most motor carriers have a license issued pursuant to the International Fuel Tax Agreement.  This statute requires quarterly reports that involve fuel receipts.  This likewise may show you the extent of driving during any particular period.
  • The black box logs may provide a wealth of information.  This data is downloadable.
  • Aside from the black box there is other electronically stored information such as computer generated bills of lading and fuel receipts and other types of electronic communication between the driver and dispatcher.
  • Keep in mind that vehicles weighing over 10,000 lbs. are commercial motor vehicles if being used for that purpose.  As such a landscape pickup truck pulling trailers could qualify.  Although the driver of these vehicles may not be required to have a CDL, most of the other trucking safety regulations do apply to these vehicles.
  • The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations are critical.  They have adopted a model CDL manual.  You should also gather books used by truck driver schools or defensive driving schools as useful sources of information.
  • If the truck only operates intrastate, keep in mind that each state has adopted most of the pertinent parts of the federal regulations.
  • Even though the driver may be an independent contractor, that does not mean he is not an employee.  Independent contractor is included within the definition of employee if the vehicle being operated is a commercial motor vehicle.  Likewise owner/operators may be considered to be employees.
  • As part of your investigation, look for systemic failures on the part of the trucking company.

When a truck accident occurs the insurance carrier and its lawyers are promptly on the case. It is not unusual that when a plaintiff is injured it takes several months before that plaintiff retains counsel. That lapse of time could be critical since many important records relating to a truck accident only need to be retained for six months.

The initial course of action therefore has to be to get a letter out to the trucking company requesting that they preserve all records and data relating to this collision.

The next critical step is to visit the scene with a trucking expert and/or reconstruction expert and perhaps an investigator who can attempt to locate any witnesses not identified on the police report.

Next it is critical to identify anything within the driver’s cab that may have either been a source of communication to or from the driver or a potential distraction to the driver. This can consist of cell phones, text messaging devices, freight tracking equipment and any satellite based navigation or communication system. All of those need to be identified and then data extracted from them.

Truck accident investigation has been made somewhat easier with the recent implementation of the Compliance Safety Accountability Program by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration of the federal government. The data available from CSA has to be requested through FOIA. This new system is designed to identify potentially high risk trucking companies. The system uses a number of different criteria to provide a rating to different companies. Those criteria are:

  • safety of the driver
  • driver fatigue
  • driver fitness
  • use of drugs or alcohol
  • vehicle maintenance
  • cargo problems
  • number of reported crashes

In perusing this data it is important to make sure that the data you have relates to the company you are investigating. When a company changes hands it receives a new Department of Transportation number.

In addition, the federal government has implemented a new pre-employment screening program that is available only to carriers relating to potential hires. Determining whether the defendant uses that system, if applicable, may certainly be helpful.

Finally, certain carriers that have been non-compliant with log requirements are now required to have an electronic on-board recorder on their trucks. These recorders are less susceptible to manipulation. In reviewing any data from these recorders it is important to be conscious of any audits of this equipment that may have been conducted so as to identify any changes to the log.

Finding Insurance in Truck Accident Cases

The vast majority of trucking companies are entities that carry substantial insurance coverage.  To some extent this is mandated by federal law.  The federal agency that oversees interstate trucking is the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.  Federal law requires the issuance of a MCS-90 Form which is an endorsement to interstate motor carrier’s insurance policies that provides essentially unconditional coverage to the public.  This endorsement is to be attached to the underlying policy that the trucking company maintains.  The language within this endorsement requires that the insurance company agrees to pay any final judgment recovered resulting from negligence regardless of whether or not each motor vehicle is specifically described in the policy.  Under the terms of this endorsement the failure of the trucking company to give proper notice of the claim and their failure to cooperate may not be a basis for a denial of coverage.  The purpose of this endorsement is to provide coverage where the underlying policy does not do so.  It only applies to interstate motor carriers.  Those terms are very specific and they are defined in the regulations. The minimum coverage is $750,000.  Keep in mind that if the tractor and trailer are separately owned then separate insurance policies may apply.

Truck Accident Where Trooper Killed

An Illinois state trooper on March 28, 2013 was hit by a tractor trailer.  He was parked on the left shoulder of Interstate 294.  The driver of a United Van Lines truck pulling a trailer loaded with household goods came at him in the left lane.  That driver had already worked a 12 hour shift loading that huge truck.  He then drove for another 4 hours.  He fell asleep at the wheel.  His truck went off the road crashing into the trooper’s vehicle.  The trooper was engulfed in flames.  He died of those burn injuries.  The 26 year-old truck driver was criminally charged.  The moving company was fined for breaking federal law prohibiting a driver to be on duty for more than 14 hours without getting rest.  The suit that was eventually filed against United Van Lines settled for over $10 Million.

There are an estimated 2 million tractor trailers on the road nationwide.  The primary causes of tractor trailer crashes are:

      1. The use of drugs which affect a driver’s reaction time account for approximately 26% of tractor trailer crashes.
      2. Speeding or traveling too fast account for approximately 23%.
      3. Being lost or driving in unfamiliar areas accounts for approximately 22% of crashes.
      4. Use of over-the-counter drugs contributes to 18% of crashes.
      5. Failure to check blind spots and carefully observe all sides of the truck before making a turn account for 14% of crashes.
      6. Fatigue accounts for 13% of crashes.
      7. Failing to use a turn signal or making some other illegal maneuver accounts for about 9% of crashes.
      8. Driver inattention accounts for approximately 8% of the crashes.
      9. Poor evasive action accounts for approximately 7% of the crashes.
      10. Aggressive driving accounts for approximately 7% of crashes.

One of the main difficulties in driving a large truck is the fact that these trucks tend to have large blind spots.  Drivers should avoid these blind spots at the rear of the truck and the side of the truck.  Likewise the connecting point between the truck and its trailer may well be a blind spot.  If you can’t see the driver in the driver’s side mirrors then that means the driver can’t see you and you may want to get out of that particular location on the roadway.

Truck Accident Crash Tips

Some tips in terms of avoiding tractor trailer crashes are:

      • If you plan on passing a tractor trailer make sure you use your turn signal and make sure that you’ve given the driver sufficient warning so that he is on alert.
      • Keep a safe distance.
      • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recommends a 4 second gap.  You can calculate this gap by starting to count when you see the rear of the truck ahead of you pass a fixed object.  If the road conditions are dangerous then that gap needs to be increased.

Truck Accident Standards

Truck accident standards are in large measure derived from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.  However those regulations are not the only source of standards.  Truck accident standards can also be found in industry standards and also in the Commercial Drivers’ License (CDL) manual.

Some of the basic industry standards are that truck drivers must approach every intersection assuming that cross traffic may not obey the traffic signals; drivers must not start a left turn until there is enough time for the rear of their vehicle to clear the intersection without forcing opposing drivers to slow down; drivers have a duty of extreme caution when it is raining and must reduce their speed by one-third (1/3).  Those basic rules can be a tremendous help in any truck accident case.  The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations carry the force of law.  Industry standards do not.

CDL Manual

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations require every state to provide a CDL manual that contains the substance of the knowledge and skills that drivers must have.  It provides the specificity that the regulations may lack.  One of the things covered in the manual is the fact that drivers need to look 12 to 15 seconds ahead in terms of their general observation.  In many circumstances the CDL manual not only for the state of the accident can be used but also the CDL manual for the state where the driver is licensed can be used.  Although typically they would be the same, there may be some slight differences.  This CDL manual becomes an excellent source of refuting the defendant’s trucking experts who state that the standard of care is determined based on the driver’s best judgment.  Another source of standards is the material that the industry uses to teach new drivers and to refresh experienced drivers in their various driving schools.  Many trucking companies also maintain what are called preventability manuals which they use after collisions to assess whether or not their drivers acted reasonably.  There are three commonly used preventability manuals that are published by the American Trucking Association, the National Safety Council and the Federal Highway Authority.  All of those can be good sources of truck accident standards.

Driver Fault in Truck Accident Cases


The truck accident-sleep apnea connection should be looked at in most truck accident cases. Sleep apnea is a condition that affects many people, in particular men over 40. It results from the muscles in the back of the throat relaxing to the point where the person cannot experience normal breathing. It typically results in the person waking up at night. This waking up may occur many times during the course of the night resulting in inadequate sleep.

Some of the common characteristics that seem to apply to people that have sleep apnea are the existence of a deviated septum, allergies, sinus problems, a larger than average neck, obesity. Men over 40 in particular are affected by this condition. Many of these men happen to be truck drivers.

As such, it may be appropriate to delve into the issue of sleep apnea of the truck driver if in fact there is any issue of sleep being a causative factor.

Sleep apnea can be dealt with surgically for what are called obstructive disorders. There are also non-surgical options such as the use of CPAP which stands for continuous positive airway pressure. This is simply a fancy term for having an oxygen mask over your nose at night so as to allow the continuous flow of oxygen so that there is no interruption of sleep.

CPAP is a somewhat cumbersome means of treatment. There are less awkward means of treatment that will help to open up the airway and to facilitate breathing while sleeping.

Falling Asleep

Any truck accident occurring as a result of the truck driver falling asleep at the wheel must involve a thorough investigation of the driver’s medical history. Most drivers are paid by the mile and, as such, the more time that they spend behind the wheel operating their rig the more money they make. Any downtime consisting of refueling time and loading and unloading time are not counted within the driver’s paycheck and therefore may be subject to misstatements as to their frequency or length.

Where it is suspected that a truck driver may have fallen asleep at the wheel there are several things that need to be looked at:

  • Any pre-employment or employment medical examinations as called for under the federal regulations should be closely examined. These may disclose the existence of conditions that are likely to cause loss of consciousness or inability to stay awake. Likewise, they may disclose any medication that the driver is on.
  • If the trailer is a refrigerated trailer, then the loading time and unloading time associated with that trailer is going to be considerably more than if the trailer is a “dry van”, i.e. one that is not refrigerated. This waiting time for the loading and unloading is on duty time but it may not be productive time for the driver in terms of earning income. The maximum time that a driver can be on duty in an eight day period is 70 hours. If he is spending 40 of those hours loading and unloading, then that only leaves him 30 hours of time on the road driving over an eight day period. As such, there may be some incentive on the driver’s part to misreport the amount of loading and unloading time. Logs and “in” and “out” times at dock facilities may be critical documents.
  • Credit card receipts at gas stations may be critical documents because they should show date and time and place of purchase of gasoline. Many fueling facilities, however, have agreements with trucking companies not to show date and time. This information, however, typically should be available from the credit card company.
  • Transponder companies market devices that allow trucks to pass through toll plazas without stopping. Some transponder companies agree not to record date and time of such events. The failure of these transponder companies to record this data pursuant to an agreement with the trucking company may well be relevant at trial. In any event, this information should still be attainable from the entity that monitors the toll booths.
  • Trucking company manuals may be sources of important information in that frequently they may record maximum speeds in various states for purposes principally of informing drivers as to what time frames they need to record on their daily log so as not to exceed permissible speed limits within any given State. The manuals also frequently tell the drivers precisely what documents the company will be looking at to determine driving time. This is a type of veiled message to the driver to make sure that the paperwork is all consistent.
  • Some trucking companies only keep driver’s logs for six months. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, however, this documentation should be kept for a minimum of two years.

Drugs or Alcohol

Truck accidents that involves potential usage of drugs or alcohol by the truck driver need to be thoroughly investigated by obtaining any and all U. S. Department of Transportation mandated or allowed testing that was done of the driver involved in the truck accident. This should include testing of alcohol and/or drug usage. Many trucking companies use third-party administrators to conduct these testing programs. If that is the case, then all of the records from that third-party administrator need to be obtained including information as to how drivers were given notification of impending tests. That is, if the driver was given adequate forewarning of a scheduled drug or alcohol test then obviously that would allow sufficient time to change behavior. Likewise, the criteria employed for labeling a test as negative or positive need to be closely scrutinized. Some medical review officers may decide on their own that the presence of prescription medication in the test results does not need to be reported as being a positive test.

The trucking company is entitled to know all medications and drugs, whether they be legal or illegal, that the driver is taking. Any such documentation is subject to disclosure along with what the trucking company’s response was to such information.

If there is any evidence of any medication or drug usage by the driver, then the entire prescription history of that driver should be obtained from the pharmacy of record. Any medical privilege typically would not extend to this type of information and therefore should be subject to disclosure.

Testing For Drugs and Alcohol

One of the first things to be obtained is any and all U. S. Department of Transportation mandated or allowed testing that was done of the driver involved in the truck accident.  This should include testing of alcohol and/or drug usage.  Many trucking companies use third-party administrators to conduct these testing programs.  If that is the case, then all of the records from that third-party administrator need to be obtained including information as to how drivers were given notification of impending tests.  That is, if the driver was given adequate forewarning of a scheduled drug or alcohol test then obviously that would allow sufficient time  to change behavior.  Likewise, the criteria employed for labeling a test as negative or positive needs to be closely scrutinized.  Some medical review officers may decide on their own that the presence of prescription medication in the test results does not need to be reported as being a positive test.

Drug History

The trucking company is entitled to know all medications and drugs, whether they be legal or illegal, that the driver is taking.  Any such documentation is subject to disclosure along with what the trucking company’s response was to such information.

If there is any evidence of any medication or drug usage by the driver, then the entire prescription history of that driver should be obtained from the pharmacy of record.

Monster Trucks

Monster trucks are becoming an increasing hazard on the roadway. Twin-trailer trucks are two to three times more likely to be involved in a truck accident than are standard trucks. These trucks can be more than 100 feet long. At that length, they become inherently unstable. They are increasingly subject to jackknifing and rollover. They are slower on acceleration which thereby delays traffic, in particular going uphill and when merging. They are subject to increased side to side movement in heavy wind conditions. On wet roads they effectively create a splash effect making travel in parallel lanes almost impossible.

Improper Maintenance

Truck accidents due to improper maintenance can be fatal. A recently reported jury verdict in Texas involved a truck wherein the drive shaft broke off underneath the tractor-trailer and flew into an oncoming lane. The 20-pound metal shaft crashed through the window of an oncoming vehicle striking the driver and resulting in his death.

The Plaintiffs in the subsequent lawsuit presented evidence that the U-joint holding the drive shaft in place had melted because of insufficient lubrication. This permitted the drive shaft to rip out of its placement. The lawsuit claimed that the U-joint had not been lubricated for at least four to six months before the incident.

The U-joint manufacturer recommended lubrication every 5,000 miles.

In addition the Plaintiffs asserted that the president of the trucking company knew that the fleet manager lacked the necessary qualifications to deal with these maintenance issues but allowed him to remain in that position.

Also a punitive damage award was sought on the grounds that the trucking company knew or should have known that the U-joint cross-piece would fail with potentially dangerous results. During the course of discovery it was learned that a mechanic at the truck company knew about this and other U-joints in the fleet’s trucks that had failed because of inadequate lubrication.
A substantial jury verdict was returned in this Texas case.


Underride refers to a motor vehicle riding under the back of a truck. This can have disastrous consequences. The U. S. Department of Transportation has published written standards regarding proper rear-impact guards for tractor trailers. There is some ongoing controversy as to what those rear-impact guards should consist of and exactly how high off the ground they should be. Under earlier regulations the rear guards could be has high as 30 inches off the pavement. That regulation may still govern some vehicles. Safety advocates maintain that the rear guards should be no higher than 18 inches above the pavement to prevent compact cars from riding under, that the strength requirements of these guards is about half what they should be and that the existing regulations should be made retroactive to apply to all tractor trailers on the roadway.

The regulations in existence do nothing to encourage the use of rear guards that actually absorb energy through the use of hydraulics. The guards that are on most vehicles at this point are fixed objects that do not absorb impact but simply are designed to prevent the striking vehicle from riding under.

The fact that the federal government has promulgated regulations dealing with this issue may, in some instances, create a federal preemption question. In general, however, state tort claims are preempted by federal regulation if the scope of the federal statute indicates the intent to occupy that field exclusively, compliance with both federal and state requirements is rendered impossible and state law somehow contravenes the congressional purpose. In regards to underride legislation, Congress has not demonstrated any intent to occupy that field exclusively and, as such, federal preemption should not be a bar to asserting state tort claims.

Aside from rear underride there is also a significant problem with side underride on tractor trailers.  The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports that there were 1,542 passenger vehicle occupants killed in two-vehicle crashes with tractor trailers in 2015 and that 301 of those involved side collisions.

At this point federal regulations do not mandate any side guards.  The Insurance Institute does estimate that the risk of injury could be reduced dramatically by such side guards.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has concluded based on its studies that trailers that are equipped with reflector tape on the side are considerably less likely to be involved in side underride incidents.

Many other countries around the world have actually implemented regulations requiring side guards.  These are designed to protect not only motorcyclists but also motor vehicle occupants.

Truck Accident Discovery To The Driver

Truck accident discovery is critical because of the complexity of trucks themselves and the complexity of the relationship between the different companies and drivers that may be involved.  What follows is a series of proposed Interrogatories to first the driver and then secondly to the truck owner or company that is responsible for the vehicle itself.

1.      Give the dates and results of all medical examinations required by the U.S. Department of Transportation stating the date of the exam, the name of the examiner, the location of the examination and the results.

2.      If you have been involved in any prior collisions or have received any prior traffic citations then give the date, circumstances, and outcome of each.

3.      If you have been cited for any violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations either in this incident or any other then give the date, circumstances of such and the outcome of any such citation.

4.      If you have ever been placed out of service for any traffic citation or FMCSR violation state the date, circumstances, and outcome of such.

5.      Identify every state that has ever issued you a driver’s license, the date of such issuance, and the current status of that license.

6.      Set forth in chronological form your prior employment, the name of the employer, dates of employment, and the reason for separation.

7.      Describe all driver training that you have had giving the dates, the name of the company or individual that provided the training and any certificates that you have received.

8.      Describe in detail the pre-employment screening process associated with the position that you occupied on the date of this incident giving the date of any such screening and the circumstances.

9.      Provide in detail all training that you have received from the company that you were associated with in regards to the vehicle in question in this case.

10.  As to any communications between yourself and the company with which you were associated with on the date of this incident give the date and time of those communications, the content of those communications, the names of the individuals involved in such communications and the nature of the communications, i.e. text, email, radio, or otherwise.

11.  Describe in detail your relationship with any of the other named Defendants to this action as of the date of this incident.

Truck Accident Discovery to the Trucking Companies

  1. Identify precisely the owner of the tractor and the trailer involved and describe in detail all signage on either of these. Include within your answer the DOT number for each vehicle and all prior business names that you have ever operated under.
  2. State whether or not the driver of the vehicle in question was acting within the scope of the employment at the time of the collision.
  3. Identify in detail and by name any documents that constitute your safety policy or policies. State in what format they exist, i.e. paper, electronic, or otherwise.
  4. Identify all policies concerning driver discipline for violation of any motor carrier safety regulations, stating the name of any such policy manual and state in what format these policies exist, i.e. paper, electronic, or otherwise.
  5. Identify in detail your safety training practices for each driver and further identify all training documents and the names of the individuals responsible for overseeing safety as of the date of the incident in question.
  6. Detail all factors affecting the driver’s compensation and within your answer set forth in detail precisely how the driver was compensated as of the date of this incident.
  7. If the tractor involved in this collision is equipped with any on-board or satellite vehicle tracking equipment then identify any such equipment and state who is the current custodian of any data from that equipment.
  8. State whether or not the driver who was involved in this collision was tested for the presence of alcohol or drugs after the collision and if so when, by whom, and what the results were of such testing.
  9. Describe in detail the employment evaluation process for the driver in question. Your answer should include but not be limited to the date of the driver’s road test, who conducted it and what the results were.
  10. In regards to the trip that the driver was working at the time of this collision set forth in detail the cargo that was being carried, the trip route, all stops and intended destinations.
  11. Set forth in detail all means by which you communicated with the driver from the beginning of this trip up to time of the collision. Identify who is the current custodian of any such communications.
  12. Identify the manufacturer and model number of the engine of the truck, the truck itself, and the trailer.
  13. Set forth the gross and curb weight of the tractor and trailer as of the time of this collision or as of the beginning of the trip in question.
  14. How many trucks and trailers do you own and/or lease and how many drivers do you employ or contract with as of the date of this collision.
  15. If you contend that there was any equipment failure that contributed to this collision then identify the nature of the equipment that you contend failed, the nature of the failure, and identify any documents that would evidence any such failure.
  16. If the truck in question was leased by you, then identify the date of any inspection of that truck, all documents evidencing any such inspection and in particular what the inspection disclosed.
  17. Set forth in detail your relationship with any other Defendants in this lawsuit.
  18. State who is the current custodian of all log books for the trip in question in this action and identify what form they exist in, i.e. paper, electronic, or otherwise.

For more information on truck accidents see the pages on Wikipedia and the other pages on this site.

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Truck Accident Lawyer

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Contact Us For A Free Consultation