Brien Roche
This page within Virginia Tort Case Law is a compilation of cases reported by the Virginia Supreme Court and summarized by Brien Roche dealing with the topic of Warranties-Choice of Remedies.
1987 Cauthorn v. British Leyland, 233 Va. 202, 355 S.E.2d 306.
Concurring opinion states that products liability claim based on breach of warranty theory should be treated as tort action, not contract action.
1966 Holz v. Coates Motor Co., 206 Va. 894, 147 S.E.2d 152.
Where there is breach of warranty in sale of personalty, buyer has two remedies: (1) return goods and demand money back; and (2) seek pecuniary damages against seller.
For more information on warranties see the pages on Wikipedia.
“I have been a client of Brien Roche for over 25 years and continue to receive exception service. Over the years he has represented in numerous situations including very large commercial transactions, business issues and others. His advice is invaluable as he listens well and is very measured in his responses. He will give you options and the pros and cons of each for you to decide what is your best course of action. I strongly encourage anyone to meet with Brien before they decide who to hire to represent them.” - Clifton Killmon
© 2024 Brien Roche Law
